When I first started programming, especially when asked for code samples, my comments lacked purpose and would often duplicate in English what the code clearly indicated. I knew that "commenting is good" but as a beginner I had no further insight.
Over time with the help of books like Clean Code, I grew disdainful of comments. Good code should be self-documenting. Whenever I needed to write a comment to explain something, I'd realize I could easily rename some key variable or function. I grew more comfortable with variables and functions with a few words in the title. Better to spend time on good code structure and naming.
I have always left TODOs though, since TODOs can't so easily be expressed in variable names. But even these TODOs concerned me because they existed in my issue tracker, or maybe should have.
As I watched mature open source projects and mature engineers, I came to value well-documented pull requests. Solid pull requests include or link to all necessary background, opportunities failed or ignored, how to use, links to external bugs requiring workarounds and the results of performance evaluation.
Beyond pull request descriptions, when I really wanted to grease a pull request I'd use the pull request UI to add comments calling reviewer attention to key changes in lines of the diff.
Both kinds of guidance are a massive aid to reviewers, saving a lot of time.
But when I'd find a bug in code -- and I knew there was good pull request documentation, even for pull requests as recent as six months ago -- I've been repeatedly failed by the pull request and pull request comment search exposed by Github and Gitlab.
I knew there were links to documented oddities or bug reports in pull request threads. But practically speaking, for historic pull requests, pull request comments are useless.
This is the single biggest reason I've started to push for more comments in code. More so than all other tools (issue tracker, code management system, etc.) comments in code have the greatest chance of still being around and easily searchable if they haven't been deleted.
Don't get me started on pull request documentation in an external medium like Slack. It's so rewarding to get or give instant feedback on changes on instant messengers, but good luck finding that discussion 3 months later.
Every time I have to call out a line of code in a pull request, that's immediate cause for that code to be modified with comments.
Maybe I wouldn't do this if Github/Gitlab exposed a Google Docs-like interface for browsing code line by line with links to all pull request comment threads.
Please reply on Twitter with questions or comments.
The biggest reason to add comments in code (often linking to documented oddities or bug reports) is because it's impossible to search pull request threads historically in every source control management UI I've used.https://t.co/JlHWfbUH5z— Phil Eaton (@phil_eaton) September 8, 2020